• TR
  • EN
Program Type: 
Thesis
Course Code: 
ANT 504
Semester: 
Spring
Course Type: 
Core
P: 
2
Lab: 
1
Credits: 
3
ECTS: 
8
Course Language: 
English
Course Coordinator: 
Courses given by: 
Course Objectives: 

The goal of this course is to inform students about the Current Debates on ethnographic theory and its applications  

Course Content: 

 Theoretical approaches on ethnography applications from past to the present 

Teaching Methods: 
1: Lecture, 2: Question-Answer, 3: Discussion 4: Simulation 5: Case Study
Assessment Methods: 
A: Testing, B: Multiple Choice C: Homework D: Fill in the blanks E: True or false F: Oral exam G: Portfolio

Vertical Tabs

Course Learning Outcomes

Learning Outcomes

Teaching Methods

Assessment Methods

1. Students will learn ethnographic approach in-depth.

1, 4

A, C

2. Students will acquire a capability of conceptual thinking  

1, 4

A, C

3. Students will learn different ethnography theories  

1, 4

A, C

4. Students will learn the Current Debates on ethnography. 

1, 4

A, C

5.  Students will gain ethnographic practice skills.

1, 4

A, C

6. Students will be able to link research methods and the Philosophy of Science.

1, 4

A, C

 

Teaching Methods: 

1: Lecture, 2: Question-Answer, 3: Discussion 4: Simulation 5: Case Study

Assessment Methods: 

A: Testing, B: Multiple Choice C: Homework D: Fill in the blanks E: True or false F: Oral exam G: Portfolio

Course Flow

COURSE FLOW

Week

Topics

Preparation

1

Introduction to the Lecture

 

2

Methodology and the Philosophy of Science I

Bhaskar, Roy. (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism a Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London, New York: Routledge. 

Foucault, Michel. (2005). The Order of Things an Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London, New York: Routledge. 

Keat, Russell, Urry, John. (2010). Social Theory as Science. London, Boston: Routledge. 

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, London. The University of Chicago Press. 

 

3

Quantitative Research Methods in Social Sciences: Survey

Gideon, Lidor. (2012). Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences. London: Springer. 

 

4

Quantitative Content Analysis and Ethnographic Content Analysis

Riffe, Daniel, Lacy, Stephen, Fico, Frederick G. (2005). Analyzing Media Messages Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.

Altheide, David L. (1987). Ethnographic Content Analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 65-77.

 

5

Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences: Oral History, Archival Research, Focus Group

Abrams, Lynn. (2010). Oral History Theory. London, New York: Routledge. 

Bloor, Michael, Frankland, Jane, Thomas, Michelle, Robson, Kate. (2002). Focus Groups in Social Research. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE

Leanardo, Micaela. (1987). Oral History as Ethnographic Encounter. The Oral History Review, 15(1), 1-20.

Rodriquez, Cherly, Baber, Yvette. (2007). Reconstructing a Community through Archival Research. (Ed.) Michael V. Angrosino, Doing Cultural Anthropology (63-71). Illinois: Waveland Press. 

Rosaldo, Renato. (1980). Doing Oral History. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Anthropology, 4, 89-99.

Wolff, Stephen. (2004). Analysis of Document and Records. (Eds) Uwe Flick, Ernst von Kardoff, Ines Steinke, A Companion to Qualitative Research (284-290). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE.  

 

6

Ethnography: an Introduction

Forsey, Martin Gerar. (2010). Ethnography as Participant Listening. Ethnography, 11(4), 558-572.

Ingold, Tim. (2008). Anthropology is not Ethnography. Procedings of the British Academy, 154, 69-92.

Ingold, Tim. (2014). That’s Enough about Ethnography. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 383-395.

Ingold, Tim. (2017). Anthropology contra Ethnography. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7(1), 21-26.

Marcus, George E. (2002). Beyond Malinowski and After Writing Culture: On the Future of Cultural Anthropology and the Predicament of Ethnography. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 13(2), 191-199.

 

7

Midterm

 

8

Classical Ethnography and Participant Observation

Becker, Howard S., Geer, Blanche. (1957). Participant Observation and Interviewing: A Comparison. Human Organization, 16(3), 28-32.

Becker, Howard S. (1958). Problems of Inference and Proof in Participant Observation. American Sociological Review, 23(6), 652-660.

Gluckman, Max. 2006 [1959]. Ethnographic Data in British Social Anthropology. (Eds) T. M. S Evens, Don Handelman, The Manchester School Practice and Ethnographic Praxis in Anthropology (13-22). New York, Oxford: Berghan Books. 

Lowie, Robert H. (1953). Ethnography, Cultural and Social Anthropology. American Anthropologist, 55(4), 527-534.

Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1932). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge. 

 

9

Ethnography at Home

Aarnikoivu, Melina. (2016). ‘Not in my Backyard but in my Front Room’: A Review of Insider Ethnography. Tiedepolitiikka, 3, 47-56.

Alvesson, Mats. At-home Ethnography: Struggling with Closeness and Closure. (Eds) Sierk Ybema, Dvora Yanow, Harry Wels, Frans Kamsteeg, Organizational Ethnography Studying Complexities of Everyday Life (156-174). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage.

Bunzl, Matti. (2004). Boas, Foucault, and the ‘Native Anthropologist’: Notes toward a Neo-Boasian Anthropology, American Anthropologist, 106(3), 435-442.

Davies, Charlotte Aull. (1999). Reflexive Ethnography a Guide to Researching Selves and Others. London, New York: Routledge. 

Halstead, Narmala. (2001). Ethnographic Encounters. Positionings within and outside the Insider Frame. Social Anthropology, 9(3), 307-321. 

Jones, Delmos J. (1995). Anthropology and the Oppressed: A Reflection on ‘Native’ Anthropology. (Ed.) E. L. Cerroni-Long, Insider Anthropology (58-70),  Arlington: American Anthropological Association.

            Lamaison, Pierre, Bourdiue, Pierre. (1986). From Rules to Strategies: an Interview with Pierre Bourdieu. Cultural Anthropology, 1(1), 110-120.

            Cerroni-Long, E. L. (1995). Introduction: Insider or Native Anthropology?. (Ed.) E. L. Cerroni-Long, Insider Anthropology (1-16), Arlington: American Anthropological Association. 

            Narayan, Kirin. (1993).  How Native is a ‘Native’ Anthropologist. American Anthropologist, 95(3), 671-686.

            Wacquant, Loic. (2004). Following Pierre Bourdieu into the Field. Ethnography, 5(4), 387-414.

 

10

Ethnography in the Post-modern Times 

Clifford, James. (1986). Introduction: Partial Truths. (Eds.) James Clifford, George Marcus, Writing Culture the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (1-26). Berkeley: University of California Press.  

Marcus, George E. (1986). Afterword: Ethnographic Writing and Anthropological Careers. . James Clifford, George Marcus, Writing Culture the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (262-266). Berkeley: University of California Press.  

Rabinow, Paul. (1986). Representations are Social Facts: Modernity and Post-Modernity in Anthropology. James Clifford, George Marcus, Writing Culture the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (234-261). Berkeley: University of California Press.  

Tyler, Stephen. (1986). Post-Modern Ethnography: From Document of the Occult to Occult Document. James Clifford, George Marcus, Writing Culture the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (122-140). Berkeley: University of California Press.  

 

11

Auto-Ethnography

Berger, Leigh, Ellis, Carolyn. (2008). Composing Autoethnographic Stories. (Ed.) Michael V. Angrosino, Doing Cultural Anthropology (63-71). Illinois: Waveland Press.

Ellis, Carolyn, Adams Tony E., Bochner Arthur P. (2011). Autoethnography: an Overview. Historical Socil Research, 36(4), 273-290.

Hayano, David M. (1979). Auto-Ethnography: Paradigms, Problems, and Prospects. Human Organization, 38(1), 99-104.

 

 

12

Institutional Ethnography

Smith, Dorothy E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography a Sociology for People. Lanham, New York, Toronto, Oxford: Altamira Press.

 

13

Activist Ethnography

Coleman, Lara Montesinos. (2015). Ethnography, Commitment, and Critique: Departing from Activist Scholarship. International Political Sociology, 9, 263-280.

            Harrison, Faye V. (2013). Navigating Feminist Activist Ethnography. (Ed.) Christa  Craven, Dana-Ain Davis, Feminist Activist Ethnography Counterpoints to Neoliberalism in North America (IX-XV). Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toront, Plymouth: Lexington Books. 

            Ortner, Sherry. (2016). Dark Anthropology and its Others. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 47-73.

 

14

Digital Etnography

Barratt, Monica J. Maddox, Alexia. (2016). Active Engagement with Stigmatized Communities through Digital Ethnography. Qualitative Research, 16(6), 701-719.

Caliandro, Alessandro. (2018). Digital Methods for Ethnography: Analytical Concepts for Ethnographers Exploring Social Media Environments. Journal of Contemporary Etnography, 47(5), 551-578. 

Cardullo, Paul. (2014). Digital Ethnography: Anthropology, Narrative and New Media. Visual Studies, 29(1), 107-108.

Murthy, Dhiraj. (2008). Digital Ethnography: an Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research. Sociology, 42(5), 837-855.

Pink, Sarah, Horst, Heather, Postill, John, Hjorth, Larissa, Lewis, Tania, Tacchi, Jo. (2016). Digital Ethnography Principles and Practice. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE.

 

15

Final Exam

 

RECOMMENDED SOURCES

Textbook

 

Additional Resources

 

       

Recommended Sources

RECOMMENDED SOURCES

Textbook

 

Additional Resources

 

The sources are indicated above for each weekly lecture

Material Sharing

MATERIAL SHARING
Documents  
Assignments Homework
Exams Midterm-Final

Assessment

ASSESSMENT

IN-TERM STUDIES

NUMBER

PERCENTAGE

Midterm

1

30

Homework

1

10

Final

1

60

Total

 

100

CONTRIBUTION OF FINAL EXAMINATION TO OVERALL GRADE

 

40

CONTRIBUTION OF IN-TERM STUDIES TO OVERALL GRADE

 

60

Total

 

100

Course’s Contribution to Program

COURSE'S CONTRIBUTION TO PROGRAM

 

No

Program Learning Outcomes

Contribution

 

1

2

3

4

5

 

 

1

The student learns about the cultural and physical development of human beings throughout history, the basic terminology of Anthropology and its basic theories. 

       

X

 

 

2

The student gains the ability to think analytically and approach topics from a critical perspective 

       

X

 

 

3

The student gains the ability to convey information effectively both in oral and written manners. 

 

X

       

 

4

The student gains an occupational ethics, social ethics, and a social responsibility. 

 

X

       

 

5

The student gains the ability to interpret cultural and historical dynamics, the cultural characteristics of Turkish culture and world cultures, analyzing the culture phenomenon and its intricate dynamics. 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

6

The students maintains an occupational and personal development beyond the understanding of the world and nation problems. 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

7

The student gains an ability to make use of the sources outside of the discipline and make this a life-long ability. 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

8

The student gains the ability to designate a research topic in line with anthropological guidelines and form the required methodology. 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

9

The student will gain the ability to question scientific and societal problems, being able to take part in individual and team projects. 

 

X