• TR
  • EN
Program Type: 
Thesis
Course Code: 
ANT 515
Semester: 
Autumn
Course Type: 
Core
P: 
3
Lab: 
0
Credits: 
3
ECTS: 
8
Course Language: 
English
Course Coordinator: 
Courses given by: 
Course Objectives: 

The goal of this course is to analyse the text on the current debates in anthropology by the participation of students.

Course Content: 

Critical contributions made to the field of anthropology from the second half of the 20th-century to the present. 

Teaching Methods: 
4. Tartışma
Assessment Methods: 
C. Ödev

Vertical Tabs

Course Learning Outcomes

Learning Outcomes

Teaching Methods

Assessment Methods

1-Students will have a grasp of the contemporary Debates in anthropology

4

C

2-Students will acquire a capability of conceptual thinking

4

C

3-Students will learn the channels from which they can follow Current developments in anthropology literature.

4

C

4-Students will learn the new research techniques.

4

C

5-Students will learn the contemporary ethnography applications.

4

C

6-Students will recognise social scientists who contributed to the anthropology literatüre.

4

C

 

Teaching Methods: 

1: Lecture, 2: Question-Answer, 3: Discussion 4: Simulation 5: Case Study

Assessment Methods: 

A: Testing, B: Multiple Choice C: Homework D: Fill in the blanks E: True or false F: Oral exam G: Portfolio

Course Flow

Lecture Course

Week 

Topics

Preparation

1

Introduction to the Lecture

 

2

Praxis Theory: The Contributions of Pierre Bourdieu

Jan Blommaert. (2005). Bourdieu the Ethnographer the Ethnographic Grounding of Habitus and Voice. The Translator, 11(2), 219-236. 

Loïc Wacquant. (2004). Following Pierre Bourdieu into the Field. Ethnography, 5(4), 387-414.

Pierre Bourdieu. (1961). The Algerians. Boston: Beacon Press. 

Pierre Bourdieu. (1979). Algeria 1960. Cambridge, London, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.  

Pierre Bourdieu. (1986). The Forms of Capital. J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press. 

Pierre Lamaison, Pierre Bourdieu. (1986). From Rules to Strategies: An Interview with Pierre Bourdieu. Cultural Anthropology, 1(1), 110-120. 

Richard Jenkins. (2006). Pierre Bourdieu. London and New York: Routledge. 

Sherry B. Ortner. (1984). Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), 126-166. 

Sherry B. Ortner. (2006). Anthropology and Social Theory Culture, Power, and the Acting Subject. Durham and London: Duke University Press; pp. 1-18.

 

3

Praxis Theory: Sherry Beth Ortner

Sherry B. Ortner. (1984). Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26(1), 126-166. 

Sherry B. Ortner. (2005). Subjectivity and Cultural Critique. Anthropological Theory, 5(1), 31-52. 

Sherry B. Ortner. (2006). Anthropology and Social Theory Culture, Power, and the Acting Subject. Durham and London: Duke University Press. 

Sherry B. Ortner. (2016). Dark Anthropology and its Others Theory since the Eighties. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 47-73. 

T. M. S. Evens and Don Handelman. (2005). The Etnographic Praxis of the Theory of Practice. Social Analysis, 49(3), 1-11. 

Ulf Hannerz. (1986). Theory in Anthropology: Small is Beautiful? The Problem of Complex Cultures. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 28(2), 362-367.

 

4

Praxis Theory: Loic Wacquant and Territorial Stigmatization

Loïc Wacquant. (2008). Urban Outcasts a Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity. 

Loïc Wacquant. (2007). Territorial Stigmatization in the Age of Advanced Marginality. Thesis Eleven, 91, 66-77. 

 

5

Anthropology and Postmodern Challenge

James Clifford. (1986). Introduction: Partial Truths. James Clifford, George Marcus (Eds). Writing Culture the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (pp. 1-26). Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. 

Marvin Harris. (1999). Theories of Culture in Postmodern Times. London, New Delhi: Altamira Press. Pp. 153-160

Melford E. Spiro. (1996). Postmodernist Anthropology, Subjectivity, and Science: A Modernist Critique. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 38(4), 756-780.

Paul Smith. (1989). Writing, General Knowledge, and Posmodern Anthropology. Discourse, 11(2), pp. 158-171.

Robert C. Ulin. (1991). Criticial Anthropology Twenty Years Later Modernism and Postmodernism in Anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 11(1), 63-89. 

Rosalind C. Morris. (2007). Legacies of Derrida: Anthropology. The Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 355-389. 

Sherry B. Ortner. (2016). Dark Anthropology and its Others Theory since the Eighties. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 47-73.

Stephen Linstead. (1993). From Postmodern Anthropology to Deconstructive Etnography. Human Relations, 46(1), 97-120. 

 

6

Historical Anthropology Today

Charles Tilly. (1978). Anthropology, History and the Annales. CRSO Working Paper 173. Michigan. 

Cherly Rodriguez, Yvette Baber. (2007). Reconstructing a Community through Archival Research. Michael V. Angrosino (ed.), Doing Cultural Anthropology Projects for Ethnographic 

Data Collection. Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc.

Clifford Geertz. (1990). History and Anthropology. New Literary History, 21 (2), 321-335.

David M. Anderson, Douglas H. Johnson. (1991). Diviners, Seers and Spirits in Eastern Africa: Towards an Historical Anthropology. Africa, 61(3), 293-298. 

Don Kalb, Hans Marks, Herman Tak. (1996). Historical Anthropology and Anthropological History: Two Distinct Programs. Focaal, 26/27, 5-13. 

Gunter Gebauer, Christoph Gulf. (2009). After the ‘Death of Man’: From Philosphical Anthropology to Historical Anthropology. Iris, I, 171-186. 

James D. Faubion. (1993). History in Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 22, 35-54.

7

Midterm

 

8

Globalization versus World-System

David Graeber. The Anthropology of Globalization (with Notes on Neomedievalism, and the End of Chinese Model of the Nation-State). American Anthropologist, 104(4), 1222-1227. 

Hans Peter Hahn. (2008). Diffusionism, Appropriation, and Globalization Some Remarks on Current Debates in Anthropology. Anthropos, 103, 191-202

Ted C. Lewellen. (2002). The Anthropology of Globalization. Westport, Connecticut, London: Bergin & Garvey.

9

Arjun Appadurai:  Global Ethnoscapes

Arjun Appadurai. Disjunction and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Meenakshi Gigi Durham, Douglas M. Kellner (eds.), Media and Cultural Studies Keyworks (584-603). Malden: Blackwell Publishing. 

Arjun Appadurai. (1998). Dead Certainty: Ethnic Violence in the Era of Globalization. Nēthrā, 2(2), 1-31. 

Arjun Appadurai. (2000). Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination. Public Culture, 12(1), 1-19. 

Arjun Appadurai. (2003). Illusion of Permanence: Interview with Arjun Appadurai by Perspecta 34. Perspecta, 34, 44-52.

Terhi Rantanen. (2006). A Mand Behind Scapes an Interview with Arjun Appadurai. Global Media and Communication, 2(1), 7-19. 

 

10

Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era

Frances E. Mascia-Lees, Patricia Sharpe, and Colleen Ballerino Cohen. (1989). The Postmodernist Turn in Anthropology: Cautions from a Feminist Perspective. Signs, 15(1), 7-33.

 

11

Contemporary Evolutionism 

Chris Knight. (2007). Revising Matrilineal Priority.Émergence et évolution de la parenté. Paris: Éditions Rue d’Ulm/Presses de l’École normale supérieure, 25-43.

Chris Knight. (2008). Early Human Kinship was Matrilineal?. N. J. Allen, H. Callan, R. Dunbar, W. James (Eds.), Early Human Kinship (61-82). Oxford: Blackwell. 

Mhairi A. Gibson, Dawid W. Lawson. (2015). Applying Evolutionary Anthropology. Evolutionary Anthropology, 24, 3-14.

Warren Shapiro. (2009). A (P)lot of Marxist Crop: A Review Article. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 35(1), 123-141. 

 

12

Cultural Studies and Anthropology

Paul Willis. (1997). Theoretically Informed Ethnographic Study. Stephen Nugent, Cris Shore (Eds.) Anthropology and Cultural Studies (182-192). London: Pluto Press.

Signe Howell. (1997). Cultural Studies and Social Anthropology: Contesting or Complementary Discourses. Stephen Nugent, Cris Shore (Eds.) Anthropology and Cultural Studies (103-125). London: Pluto Press. 

Stephen Nugent. (1997). Brother, Can you Share a Paradigm?. Stephen Nugent, Cris Shore (Eds.) Anthropology and Cultural Studies (1-10). London: Pluto Press

 

13

Cyborg Anthropology 

Antonio Sandu. (2015). The Anthropology of Immortality and the Crisis of Posthuman Conscience. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 14 (40), 3-26.

Gary Lee Downey, Joseph Dumit, Sarah Williams. (1995). Cyborg Anthropology. Cultural Anthropology, 10(2), 264-265. 

Neil L. Whitehead, Michael Wesch. (2009). Human No More Digital Subjectivities in a Post-Human Anthropology. In Focus, Anthropology News, December, 12. 

Neil L. Whitehead. (2009). Post-Human Anthropology. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 16, 1-32. 

 

14

Do we still Need Anthropology?

Immanuel Wallerstein. (2003). Anthropology, Sociology, and Other Dubious Disciplines. Current Anthropology, 44(4), 453-465. 

P. Steven Sangren. (2007). Anthropology of Anthropology?: Further Reflections on Reflexivity. Anthropology Today, 23 (4), 13-16. 

 

 

15

Final Exam

 

RECOMMENDED SOURCES

Textbook

 

Additional Resources

The sources used for the preparation of weekly lectures are indicated above.

       

Recommended Sources

RECOMMENDED SOURCES

Textbook

 

Additional Resources

The sources used for the preparation of weekly lectures are indicated above.

Material Sharing

MATERIAL SHARING

Documents

 

Assignments

Homework

Exams

 

Assessment

ASSESSMENT

IN-TERM STUDIES

NUMBER

PERCENTAGE

Midterm

   

Homework

1

100

Final

   

Total

 

100

Course’s Contribution to Program

COURSE'S CONTRIBUTION TO PROGRAM  
No Program Learning Outcomes Contribution  
1 2 3 4 5    
1 The student learns about the cultural and physical development of human beings throughout history, the basic terminology of Anthropology and its basic theories.          X    
2 The student gains the ability to think analytically and approach topics from a critical perspective          X    
3 The student gains the ability to convey information effectively both in oral and written manners.    X          
4 The student gains an occupational ethics, social ethics, and a social responsibility.    X          
5 The student gains the ability to interpret cultural and historical dynamics, the cultural characteristics of Turkish culture and world cultures, analyzing the culture phenomenon and its intricate dynamics.          X    
6 The students maintains an occupational and personal development beyond the understanding of the world and nation problems.    X          
7 The student gains an ability to make use of the sources outside of the discipline and make this a life-long ability.    X          
8 The student gains the ability to designate a research topic in line with anthropological guidelines and form the required methodology.          X    
9 The student will gain the ability to question scientific and societal problems, being able to take part in individual and team projects.    X